
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/
Comments regarding this
document should be sent to Richard Jones (
Author: Richard Jones
(
DSpace Version: 1.1.1
Tapir Version: 0.3 pre-release
1.1.
Notation and Fonts for this Document
2. Communities and Collections
2.1.4.
Community Naming Conventions
2.2.4.
Collection Naming Conventions
2.4.
Configuring Workflow Steps
2.4.1.
Theses or Dissertations
2.4.2.
Other Research Material
2.5.
Configuring Item Templates
2.5.1.
Theses and Dissertations
2.5.2.
Other Research Material
3.2.
Adding Users to User Groups
3.3.
Removing Users from User Groups
4.2.
Duties of the Workflow Groups
4.2.1
Step One: College Office
4.3.
Publisher Naming Conventions
4.4.
Licensing and Restrictions
4.4.1.
Description of Licences and Restrictions
4.4.2.
Structure of the Licence
4.6.
Configuring Supervision Orders
4.6.1.
Viewing Current Supervision Orders
4.6.2.
Adding Supervision Orders
4.6.3.
Removing Supervision Orders
4.6.4.
Customising Supervision Order Policies.
5.2.
Duties of the Workflow Groups
5.2.2.
Step Two: School Administrator
6.
Authorisation Administration
6.2.1.
Default Supervisor Policies
6.2.2.
Changing Supervisor Policies
6.4.
General Policy Administration
6.4.2. Community, Collection or Item
Policies
6.4.3. Advanced/Item Wildcard Policy
Admin Tool
7.
Common Tasks and Troubleshooting
7.1.
New User Wants to Submit to a Collection
7.2.
Submitted Item Contains Incorrect File.
7.3.
An Item has been submitted to the Wrong Collection
7.4.
Rejecting submissions from workflow step 3
Appendix
B: Workflow Documentation
Appendix
C: Custom Workflow Setups
This document
details the methods used to administer the Edinburgh Research Archive (ERA).
Methods of
performing basic and essential tasks are explained with reference to system
naming conventions. Common tasks that
ERA administrators might be asked to perform are explained in step-by-step
instructions, and examples are given throughout.
This document uses the following standard notation types and fonts in the following contexts:
Plain Sans-Serif Font - The general text of this document.
<Italic
Fixed-Width Font in Angle Brackets> - Everything, including the
angle brackets should be replaced with a variable value. This is often used in conjunction with the
italic fixed-width font.
Plain Fixed-Width Font – Example of text that the administrator might enter into the system.
Bold Sans-Serif Font - A statement to
which particular attention should be paid, or a reference to another section of
this document. In the case of reference
to another document, the full reference to the section will be given in the
form Section Number: Section Title.
Italic Sans-Serif Font - An inline example or reference to the system.
ERA
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/
ERA Administration Area
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/admin/
On attempting to perform any action in ERA which requires authentication you will be prompted to log in. Enter your email address and your password and hit Log In.
Communities and Collections in ERA are used to create a
shallow hierarchy within which the university's research will be
categorised. A community maps directly,
in most cases, onto a single recognisable academic unit such as the School
name. For example, the
Naturally, this relationship of communities and collections to academic units does not always hold. It is up to the administrator to use discretion when allocating communities and collections. As a further example of where this has been that case, we present the community: Scottish Natural Heritage which is being hosted in ERA on behalf of that organisation. This contains the collection Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Reports which represents a sub-section of their working area which we are curating for them.
In the admin area of ERA, select Communities/Collections from the menu on the left. You will be taken to a page entitled Edit Communities and Collections. Press the button at the top of the page, which is labelled Create Community…. You will be taken to a page with a number of fields to be filled in.
To find out more about the fields that can be filled in, see the section 2.1.3: Community Properties.
In the admin area of ERA, select Communities/Collections from the menu on the left. You will be taken to a page entitled Edit Communities and Collections. Communities are the headings in the list, and appear in grey rows. Find the Community that you would like to edit, and press the Edit button which appears to the right of it. You will be taken to a page with a number of fields to be filled in.
To find out more about the fields that can be filled in, see the section 2.1.3: Community Properties.
Below we detail the contents that you should be able to enter into each of the fields in the Community:
<p>This is my introductory paragraph</p>
<p>This
is my second introductory paragraph</p>
Please ensure that your HTML is valid and that it works.
The Community name should take the following form:
<school to which the Community belongs>
(<special designation>)
For example, the
Biological Sciences
If the Community has a special designation, this should be declared in brackets after the name of the school. For example, if the Community is to contain theses and dissertations the name would be:
Biological Sciences (Theses and
Dissertations)
For more information regarding special designations for Communities
see the section 2.3: Special
Designations.
In the admin area of ERA, select Communities/Collections from the menu on the left. You will be taken to a page entitled Edit Communities and Collections. Find the Community to which you would like to add a Collection and press Create Collection on the right. You will be taken to a page with a number of fields to be filled in.
To find out more about the fields that can be filled in, see the section 2.2.3: Collection Properties.
In the admin area of ERA, select Communities/Collections from the menu on the left. You will be taken to a page entitled Edit Communities and Collections. In the list which appears, Collections are subheadings, and appear in white bars. There are often several Collections within Communities. Find the Collection that you would like to edit, and press the Edit button which appears to the right of it. You will be taken to a page with a number of fields to be filled in.
To find out more about the fields that can be filled in, see the section 2.2.3: Collection Properties.
Below we detail the contents that you should be able to enter into each of the fields in the Collection:
<p>This is my introductory paragraph</p>
<p>This is my second introductory paragraph</p>
Please ensure that your HTML is valid and that it works.
There are additional options at the bottom of the Edit Collection page. The options available here are detailed in the sections: 2.4: Configuring Workflow Steps, 2.5: Configuring Item Templates and 6: Authorisation Administration.
The Collection name should take the following form:
<working/research
group to which the Collection belongs> (<special designation>)
For example, the Institute for Stem Cell Research (ISCR), in the School of Biological Sciences should simply be called:
Institute for Stem Cell Research (ISCR)
If the Collection has a special designation, this should be declared in brackets after the name of the working/research group. In addition, if the Community to which the Collection belongs has a special designation this should also be declared in the brackets. For example, if the Collection belongs to the Biological Sciences (Theses and Dissertations) Community, the name would be:
Institute for Stem Cell Research (ISCR)
(Theses and Dissertations)
If the Collection is a catch-all for items which do not fall
into any other working/research group’s Collection, and belongs to, for
example, the
Law (General)
For more information regarding special designations for Collections
see the section 2.6: Special Designations.
The following are the standard special designations that may be applied to Communities and Collections:
There are three workflow steps available for each Collection. To insert workflow groups see the section 2.2.2: Editing Collections to find out how to see the Collection options, then select Create next to the workflow step number for which you wish to make a group, or Edit if you wish to edit the contents of a group which already exists.
When creating the groups, you should adhere to the group naming conventions laid out in the section 3.2: Group Naming Conventions. Instructions on creating groups are available in the section 3.1: Creating User Groups.
The remainder of this section deals with the workflows you will need for different sorts of Collections.
If your Collection is specially designated as a Thesis and
Dissertations Collection then it is necessary to apply the workflow
configuration detailed in the section 4.1:
Configuring the Workflow.
If your Collection is not specially designated then it is necessary to apply the workflow configuration detailed in the section 5.1: Configuring the Workflow.
An Item Template allows the Collection to apply any number of default values to a submission at the point at which it is created. When the user selects Start New Submission the values from the item template are automatically added to the new submission and displayed to the user.
To apply an item template, in the admin area select Communities/Collections from the menu on
the left. Find the Collection to which
you would like to add or edit the item template and click Edit. Near the bottom of the
Edit Collection page to which you are
taken click Edit next to Item template. You may now apply settings as per the
following sections.
If your Collection is specially designated as a Thesis and
Dissertations Collection, an item template is required. For details of the contents of this template
see the section 4.5: Item Template.
There are currently no requirements to set up an Item Template for Collections that do not have specific designations.
The following guidelines will help ensure that user groups within ERA can be easily identified and thus more easily administered.
There are three different types of user group:
1) Workflow Groups
2) Supervisor Groups
3) Submitter Groups
Type (1) comprises of all groups that contain users who will work on post-submission workflow stages, type (2) comprises all groups that contain users who will supervise submitters, and type (3) comprises all groups that contain users which can submit items to given collections. Therefore, if a user is to be allowed to submit to a collection they should be added to that collection's submitter group; if a user is to supervise a submitter they should be added to that submitters supervisor group; if a user is to perform one of the post-submission workflow procedures they should be added to the relevant step of that collection's workflow group.
This section details how to create groups, add users to them, remove them and have them conform to the ERA naming conventions.
In the ERA Admin area select Groups from the menu on the left; this will give you a list of all the current user groups that exist. Click on Create New Group to get to the group creation screen. First change the name of the group as per the section 3.2: Group Naming Conventions and hit Update Name. Once the group has been renamed click on Add EPerson to Group; this gives you a list of all the email addresses of EPeople on the system. Select as many EPeople as you require to be added to the group; to select multiple email addresses hold down <Ctrl> on your keyboard while clicking on the list. Once you have chosen all of the people that you wish to add to the group click on Add EPerson.
The group has now been created with all of the selected EPeople.
In the ERA Admin area select Groups from the menu on the left; this will give you a list of all the current user groups that exist. Find the group that you wish to add a user to and select Edit from the line on which you find the group. Click on Add EPerson to Group; this gives you a list of all the email addresses of EPeople on the system. Select as many EPeople as you require to be added to the group; to select multiple email addresses hold down <Ctrl> on your keyboard while clicking on the list. Once you have chosen all of the people that you wish to add to the group click on Add EPerson.
The group has now been created with all of the additional EPeople.
In the ERA Admin area select Groups from the menu on the left; this will give you a list of all the current user groups that exist. Find the group that you wish to remove a user from and select Edit from the line on which you find the group. Click on Remove next to each user that you wish to remove from the group.
In the ERA Admin area select Groups from the menu on the left; this will give you a list of all
the current user groups that exist. Find
the group that you wish to remove and click Delete
on the line on which you find it.
Note: Administrators
are, by their very nature, capable of performing many potentially damaging
operations within the system, and great care should be exercised when logged in
as an administrator and performing hazardous operations. Changes cannot be undone.
All group names (with the exception of the Administrator and Anonymous groups, which should never be renamed) must follow the naming conventions laid out here.
These groups contain users whose role is to receive the submitted items at a specified stage of the workflow. The name of these groups should be of the form:
For example:
WF(3):
This is the workflow group dealing with the third workflow step for the Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology Collection.
WF(2): Accounting
and Business Method (Theses and Dissertations)
This is the workflow group dealing with the third workflow step for the Accounting and Business Method (Theses and Dissertations) Collection.
These groups contain supervisors and advisors for one specific supervision order over a single thesis. The name of these groups should be of the form:
For example:
SU:
a.n.other@ed.ac.uk
Supervising group for the item being authored by the person with the email address: a.n.other@ed.ac.uk
These groups contain the users who may submit to a particular Collection in ERA. The name of these groups should be of the form:
For example:
IN: Accounting and
Business Method (Theses and Dissertations)
This would contain PhD and Masters Students submitting to the Accounting and Business Method (Theses and Dissertations) Collection.
IN:
This would contain academics working for the Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology who are submitting content to ERA.
If your Collection is specially designated as a Thesis and Dissertations Collection, the following workflow configuration is required:
For details of the
duties of these groups see the section 4.2: Duties of the Workflow Groups.
The theses and dissertation workflow is due to change in line with upcoming university policy. The workflow will, in the fullness of time, be migrated to the following form:
For more information regarding the future workflow see Appendix B.
Each of the workflow groups performs a specific function in
the ingest of submitted items into ERA.
In this section we detail the duties of each workflow group.
The College Office for the relevant department of the submitter is responsible for ensuring that all of the criteria for E-Thesis submission have been met before allowing the submission to continue. The checks that need to be performed are as follows:
If all of the above criteria are considered to be met by the relevant College Office then the item may be accepted to move on to the next workflow stage.
This workflow step is currently left empty, although it can be filled later with a group who require the facilities: edit metadata, reject, approve for submission.
The Library is responsible for ensuring that the item meets the minimum requirements to enter into the archive. The following tasks or checks need to me done before approving the submission:
Once these tasks have been performed, the item can be accepted into the archive.
The Publisher in the context of a thesis or dissertation is considered to be the school in which the student was based during the work. This is of the form:
For example, if the student performed the work within some
unit of the
There are three licences that are simultaneously agreed to when submitting a thesis or dissertation:
1. Deposit Licence: This gives ERA the rights it requires to accept the submission, such as a non-exclusive licence to publish the work and to preserve it in whatever manner necessary; a confirmation that the work does not infringe copyright; and confirmation that the University is not obliged to take legal action in the event of breach of copyright or other intellectual property rights.
2. User Licence: This gives visitors to the site the rights that they need in order to obtain reasonable, free access to the work. This is a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/).
3.
Restriction
Licence: A request by the author to restrict the licence from all but ERA
administrators (only for the purpose of preservation and long term storage).
See Appendix A for copies of the licences.
There are 6 kinds of restriction setting available for theses and dissertations. This restriction level defines how the licences detailed above will be applied at submission:
1. No Restriction: The thesis or dissertation is publicly available
2.
Domain
Restricted 1 Year: The thesis or dissertation may not be viewed by
non-affiliates of the
3.
Domain
Restricted 2 Years: The thesis or dissertation may not be viewed by
non-affiliates of the
4. Restricted 1 Year: The thesis or dissertation may not be viewed by anyone other than the submitter and supervisors for a period of one year. After this it reverts to (1).
5. Restricted 2 Years: The thesis or dissertation may not be viewed by anyone other than the submitter and supervisors for a period of two years. After this it reverts to (1).
6. Total Restriction: The thesis or dissertation is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and may not be viewed by anyone other than the author and supervisors for an indefinite period. It will never be publicly available unless specifically requested by the author at a later date.
The licence takes the form:
Below is an example of what you may encounter when opening the licence file:
License granted by Andrew
Other (a.n.other@ed.ac.uk) on 2004-06-16T14:44:58Z (GMT):
This header information lets you know who agreed to the
licence, their email address, and when they agreed.
=========================================================
Time Dependencies on
this Licence
=========================================================
The “Permanent
Licence” contained within this file is limited in scope for 2 years. Until
For all users
outside ed.ac.uk the “Temporary Licence” contained within this file applies.
=========================================================
The next section is then the time dependency header. This let you know if there are any restrictions in this licence that expire after a certain timeframe. These are restrictions (2), (3), (4) and (5) in the section 4.4.1: Description of Licences and Restrictions. If this header is present you will have to apply one of those restrictions (more information on this further down); if not then the licence is either a permanent restriction or publicly available. In general most licences will be publicly available.
If the item does not have a time dependency header then the next section will read:
=========================================================
| Use Licence |
=========================================================
This is followed by the text of the standard user licence as per Appendix A. Each section of the licence is separated from the other sections by a horizontal line thus:
=========================================================
If the item does have a time dependency then the rest of this part of the licence is split into two parts: a permanent licence and a temporary licence. The permanent licence section defines the licence after the period that the time dependency header covers, and is denoted thus:
=========================================================
| Permanent Licence
|
=========================================================
The temporary licence section defines the licence during the period that the time dependency header defines, and is denoted thus:
=========================================================
| Temporary Licence
|
=========================================================
The licence then always terminates with the deposit licence irrespective of the content that is provided before. The deposit licence is denoted thus (it is still currently referred to as a site licence but this term is deprecated):
=========================================================
| Site Licence |
=========================================================
To set up an item template follow the instructions in 2.5: Configuring Item Templates to set
up the template and use the values as described below:
Select publisher from the pull-down list underneath the columns Elements and Qualifier, then enter the Value as per the section 4.3: Publisher Naming Conventions. In the box under the column Language you should enter letters: en. Press Add, and the default value for the publisher will be added to the item template.
If you make a mistake with this it is necessary to press Remove and to start entering the publisher details again from scratch.
Supervision Orders are managed in the ERA Administration area. Select Supervisors from the menu on the left and you are presented with three options:
The sections below detail how to deal with common supervision order tasks.
Note: The option to Clean Supervision Order Database should be used once in a while just to perform basic maintenance operations on the database. It is completely automatic and takes a very short time to execute. Simply click the Clean Supervision Order Database button once in a while.
Select View Current Supervision Orders and you are presented with a list of all supervision orders currently in effect. From this page you can modify the policies for the supervision order (See the section 6.2: Supervisor Groups) or remove the supervision order (See the section 4.6.3: Removing Supervision Orders).
The details you have on this page allow you to see the name of the group doing the supervising, the author of the item being supervised and the title of that item.
You may also add a supervision order from this page as per
the section 4.6.2: Adding Supervision
Orders.
Select Add a Supervision Order from either the main supervision order page or the Current Supervision Orders page.
To set a supervision order you need to define the group to do the supervising and the item in the workspace to be supervised. In addition, this page gives you the option to set a default set of policies for the supervising group to have over the item. For more information on the policies see the section 6.2: Supervisor Groups.
Select the desired group from the pull down list of groups on this page. The group should be named as per the naming conventions in 3.2.2: Supervisor Groups. Next select the WorkSpace to be Supervised. This means clicking on the round select button on the right of the item in the listing you can see on this page.
Note: the ID that is in the left hand column of the item listing is the database id for the workspace item, and is there for the reference of system administrators.
Once you have chosen the group and the workspace item to be connected you may also select a default policy from the Initial Policy Setting pull down box. For more information on the nature of these policies see the section 6.2.1: Default Supervisor Policies.
Once happy with your selection click on Submit Supervision Order and your settings will be applied, and you will be returned to the supervision order main page.
Go to the View Current Supervision Orders page and select Remove from the supervision order that to wish to remove. You will be asked to confirm the removal of the order, upon confirmation of which it will be removed from the system.
Go to the View Current Supervision Orders page and select Policies for the supervision order for which you would like to customise the policies. You will be taken to the Policies for Item page. From here you may customise the policies for the particular item.
In order to set policies for the supervisor group you should select, for example, Add New Policy for the item or any of its component parts, then select the supervisor group that you are wanting to configure from the given list of groups. You can then select the Action that you want to perform and hit Save Policy.
For more details on policy administration see the section 6.4: General Policy Administration.
Each of the workflow groups performs a specific function in the ingest of submitted items into ERA. In this section we detail the duties of each workflow group
If your Collection is not specially designated (see section 2.3: Special Designations for more information), the following workflow configuration is required:
Workflow Step 2 Group: This group should contain a school secretary or local school administrator who can verify the validity and authenticity of submissions.
For details of the
duties of these groups see the section 5.2: Duties of the Workflow Groups.
Note: The set up in this section is dependent
on the desires of the collection administrators. Specific workflow setups for collections
within ERA are detailed in Appendix C.
Each of the workflow groups performs a specific function in
the ingest of submitted items into ERA.
In this section we detail the duties of each workflow group.
This workflow step is currently left empty, although it can be filled later with a group who require the facilities: reject, approve for submission.
The School Administrator for the relevant department of the submitter is responsible for ensuring that all of the criteria for allowing submission of a piece of research material have been met before allowing the submission to continue. The checks that need to be performed are as follows:
If all of the above criteria are considered to be met by the relevant School Administrator then the item may be accepted to move on to the next workflow stage.
The Library is responsible for ensuring that the item meets the minimal requirements to enter the archive. The following tasks or checks need to me done before approving the submission:
Once these tasks have been performed, the item can be accepted into the archive.
To administer the system authorisations, go to the ERA admin area and select Authorization from the menu on the left. This provides you with four options:
1. Manage a Community's Policies
2. Manage Collection's Policies
3. Manage An Item's Policies
4. Advanced/Item Wildcard Policy Admin Tool
The following sections use one of these options to configure the authorisations required by the system.
Submitter groups are groups of individuals who are permitted to submit to a given collection. Each collection should have exactly one submitter group associated with it, and all authorised users should be added to that group.
In the Authorisation Administration section of the ERA admin area select Manage Collection's Policies. You are presented with a list of all the Collections in the system. Select the Collection that you wish to configure the submitter group policies for and then click Edit Policies. You are now presented with a list of all the current policies associated with that Collection.
Click Add New at
the top of the page and you are presented with a list of all the groups on the
system. Select the group that you wish
to set up a policy for. It should be
possible to locate the group easily as it will be named as per the section 3.2.3: Submitter Groups.
Underneath the list of all the user groups, go to the Action: pull-down menu, choose ADD then click Save Policy. This returns you to the policy listing for the Collection and you should see a new line which has the new policy detailed.
In general the polices for your supervisor groups are pre-defined at the point of creation of the Supervision Order. See the section 4.6: Configuring Supervision Orders for more information. This section then details the default policies that are defined when creating supervision orders.
There are three default policy types that can be applied when a supervision order is created:
1. None - The supervision order is created but the supervising group is not given any policies regarding the item to be supervised. This usually indicates that the administrator has decided to manually set policies for this supervision order.
2. Observer - The supervising group is given READ access to the item (but not to any bundles or bitstreams that already exist). Any new bundles or bitstreams inherit the supervision group's policy to permit READ operations.
3. Editor - The supervising group is given ADD, WRITE, and READ access to the item (but not any bundles or bitstreams that already exist). Any new bundles or bitstreams inherit the supervising groups's policy to permit ADD, WRITE and READ operations.
In the ERA Admin area select Supervisors from the menu on the left then click View Current Supervision Orders. This shows you a list of all of the supervision orders currently set. On the left of the supervision order whose policy you wish to modify click on Policies, and you will be taken to the policy set for the item.
From this page you may add new policies as per the section Authorisation Administration: General
Policy Administration.
The policies for workflow groups are automatically managed by the system when the group is set up as a workflow group. The policies this group has are dependent on the position in the workflow that they occupy.
In the ERA Admin area select Authorization from the menu on the left. This gives you access to the four policy administration areas.
The following authorisation actions are available:
Click Manage a Communitiy's Policies, Manage a Collection's Policies or Manage an Item's Policies, then choose
the community or collection that you want to configure, or enter the handle or
ID of the item that you want to work with.
You will be provided with a list of the current policies associated with
that system entity.
The
relevant parts of the policy are discussed briefly here:
To set a
new policy hit Add New, to edit an
existing policy hit Edit on the
relevant policy line, and to remove a polity hit Delete on the relevant policy line.
When adding
a new policy you need to select the group to which the policy will apply for
the community, collection or item, and the action that the policy deal with
(see 6.4.1 Authorisation Actions for
more information). When editing a policy
you can use exactly the same procedures as for adding a policy, but the values
in the form will be pre-populated.
Note: If
editing a policy, do not hit cancel
unless you wish to remove the policy from the object. Instead use save policy without changing any details.
This tool
allows you to set policies on items and their bitstreams for specific
collections. Select Advanced/Item Wildcard Policy Admin Tool from the Authorization page to use this tool.
First
select the collection to whose items or bitstreams you wish to apply
policies. Next you need to choose the
level at which you wish to apply the policies from the Content Type field. Choose
either item or bitstream to effect all items or all bitstreams
respectively. Third, choose the group to
whom the policy will be granted, and then finally the action that will be
granted to the group for the items or bitstreams in the given collection.
To add this
new policy then you hit Add Policy at
the bottom of the page. If, instead, you
are wishing to remove a certain type of policy that may or may not exist in the
system you can use Clear Policies and
any matching policies will be cleared. This should be used with extreme caution as
no indication as to the actions performed will be fed back to the
administrator.
A user contacts the administrator when they have registered for an ERA account and have attempted to submit an item for the first time. At this stage they are presented with an error message announcing that they do not have permission to submit to any Collections and should contact the ERA administrator.
Once the user has contacted the administrator the following procedure must be followed:
IN: <Collection to be
submitted to>
Otherwise it will need to be created as per the section 3.1: Creating User Groups.
The user will now be able to submit items to the Collection.
Note: changing files in
the archive introduces some inconsistency in the persistence of the data. For this reason changing files in items
should be done only when absolutely necessary.
Ideally it should be done only immediately after an item has been
submitted to the archive, when it is clear that an error has occurred. Otherwise the old file should either be kept
in the archive and the new file uploaded alongside it, or a new item should be
created containing the correct files
A user has submitted an item which contains the wrong file. There are three possibilities for the current situation of the item:
1. It is in the workflow, in stages 1 or 2
2. It is in the workflow, in stage 3
3. It is in the archive
If it is in the workflow stages 1 or 2 then the item should be rejected, and the user may correct the error in their workspace. If the item has made it to workflow 3 then refer to the section 7.4: Rejecting submissions from workflow step 3. The remainder of this section deals with the case where the item has already passed through the workflow and is in the archive.
You need to click on Add after you enter each metadata element.
Note: If an item has been submitted to the wrong collection, it is possible that the user's permissions are not set correctly, and this should be looked at in parallel to resolving the issue addressed here.
If an item has been submitted to the wrong collection it could be in one of three states:
1. In workflow steps 1 or 2
2. In workflow step 3
3. In the archive
If (1) the item should simply be rejected back to the user's workspace. If (2) look at the sub-section 7.4: Rejecting submission from workflow step 3. The remainder of this section deals with the case where the item is already in the archive.
This solution requires a degree of technical capability, and should not be attempted without some familiarity with the Linux operation system. If in doubt please contact the systems administrator for help.
UPDATE
collection2item SET collection_id = <new collection id> WHERE item_id =
<item id>
./index-all
Since the workflow step 3 options do not include a Reject facility it is necessary to go to the admin area to solve this problem.
A form of persistent identifier which ERA uses to provide permanent locators to its content over time. This is a service provided for free by a third party (CNRI). Handles for items in ERA can be see on the item metadata page in the form http://hdl.handle.net/handle/1842/xxx.
COVERED WORK
I would like to deposit my material in the
NON-EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS
Rights granted to ERA through this agreement are entirely
non-exclusive. I am free to publish the Work in its present version or future
versions elsewhere. I agree that ERA
may, without changing content, translate the Work to any medium or format for
the purpose of secure storage.
DEPOSIT IN ERA
I understand that work deposited in ERA will be accessible
to a wide variety of people and institutions - including automated agents - via
the World Wide Web.
I understand that once the Work is deposited, a citation to
the Work will always remain visible, although the author retains the right to
update the Work. Removal of the item can be made after discussion with ERA administrators.
I AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
- That I have the authority of the authors to make this
agreement, and to hereby give ERA the right to make available the Work in the
way described above.
- That I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the Work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge infringe upon anyone's copyright.
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0
You are free:
- to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
- to make derivative works
Under the following conditions:
-Attribution.
You must give the original author credit.
-Noncommercial.
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
-Share Alike.
If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one.
For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the author.
Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.
********************************************************************************
URL (human-readable summary):
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/
URL (legal code):
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/legalcode
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. To view a copy of this license,
visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons,
I request that no access of any kind be permitted to this item. No access means that no-one, not even the author, will have access to this item excepting ERA administrators for the purposes of long term storage and preservation only.
The
Theses management at
the
Incorporating
electronic theses
Version 1- 5.11.04
Circulation- Internal
Author: Dr Theo Andrew
This paper proposes a viable approach for the adoption of a University-wide electronic thesis deposit system which will supplement the existing system of print management. The proposal here is built upon research findings from the JISC-funded Theses Alive pilot project. This paper will be of interest to:
Background
The JISC-funded Theses Alive! project was initiated in Oct 2002 and is due to end in Oct 2004. The projects aims and objectives were to investigate the procedures and processes required in setting up an institutional electronic theses programme, and to develop tools for the digital management of electronic theses and dissemination via the internet. The project was instrumental in developing and setting up the Edinburgh Research Archive (ERA), a digital institutional repository capable of capturing, storing, managing and disseminating all forms of digital research output produced by the university. ERA has been operational as a pilot project since June 2004 and is due to be formally launched as a digital library service in October.
Dual e-thesis/print thesis submission proposal
1. This paper describes a new system for theses management utilising the benefits networked computing can offer. As this proposal does not affect the established practice of thesis examination, a number of prior actions occur before the process described here. These prior actions include:
2. We have identified two areas that need addressing before the student submits their thesis. Firstly, the students need to be aware of the electronic thesis submission process and have adequate support from the institution. Guidance should be provided from the relevant Faculty Office prior to final submission. This could take the form of literature provided by the library advising students of the process.
3. Secondly, permission will need to be sought for any third party copyright material included in the thesis. Practically speaking, only the authors know what material in their thesis requires copyright clearance. It is unrealistic for an institution to verify each thesis for breach of third party copyright, to seek permissions if necessary, all on top of the ancillary checks that need to take place. We suggest that authors should have the responsibility for this task as they are in the best position to do so. However, placing the onus on authors can be a huge burden without support. Therefore it may be necessary to provide training during the writing process to inform authors of copyright responsibilities. Such training could be incorporated into existing Thesis Workshops.
4. The electronic thesis deposit system described here starts when the student submits their e-thesis to ERA. This can occur via the internet, or by mediated deposit when hard to do so, e.g. physical restrictions or thesis problems. Once the thesis has been deposited the item is sent to the Workflow Step 1 task pool.
WF(1): Bindery staff
5. ERA automatically generates and sends email to the Bindery alerting staff to the new submitted thesis. Contained within the text is a URL which directs the staff to the Bindery task pool in ERA where the files can be downloaded (Fig.1.)

Figure 1: Email generated by ERA Workflow Step 1 informing Bindery staff of new submission


Figure 2: Workflow Step 1 task pool (arrow points to submitted item).
6. Bindery staff contact student via email to confirm the print run details, binding options/specifications and payment options.
7. Payment options will include the choice to pay over the internet using a credit/debit card, which is not currently available, via The University of Edinburgh's Electronic Receipting Application (http://www.finance.ed.ac.uk/ePayment/erafrontpage.htm). For those who do not wish to pay by credit/debit card then payment can be made at the Main Library site Bindery.
8. Once confirmed the Bindery will print/bind the thesis from the downloaded files in ERA, plus any requested additional copies. Once this is done then the e-thesis can be moved to the next stage of the workflow (as shown in Fig.3).


Figure 3: Workflow step 1 options
9. The primary print copy, along with copies of the abstract will then be sent to the relevant faculty office via internal mail, whilst the additional copies will be picked up by the student from the Main Library site. Any outstanding payments (i.e. non-credit card) can be made at this point.
Faculty Office
10. The student is required to go to the Faculty Office to sign the primary print copy of the thesis and to be checked off the graduation list. Also at this point any debts to the university are also checked, which could include the printing/binding costs incurred. With this administrative task completed the primary print copy is sent to the Main Library.
WF(2): Special
Collections/Cataloguing
11. After the e-thesis is signed off from Workflow step 1 it is assigned to the Special Collections task pool. An email is automatically generated to the relevant staff which directs them to the task pool in ERA (Similar to Fig.1).
(b) (a)
![]()

Figure 4: Workflow step 2 options. Edit metadata option (a) and approval option (b) highlighted.
12. Information input by the submitter forms the basis for the enhanced Dublin Core metadata record generated by ERA. As this is input from the student directly it needs to be checked and verified by the cataloguing staff. This can be easily done from the Workflow step 2 options (Fig.4.). Where appropriate, this record can be enhanced by
metadata editors, for example assigning Library of Congress Subject Headings for HSS theses. Depending on the metadata editor’s preferences this work can be carried out on either the e-thesis or the primary print copy as the workflow converges at this point (See flowchart). However, it is envisaged that any metadata enhancements would be recorded electronically in ERA.
13. Once the metadata records have been validated and enhanced, the item can be approved (Fig. 4b) and sent to the next ERA administrative workflow step.
14. Outside of the thesis submission critical path a number of additional tasks take place. This includes sending the abstract of the thesis to the ‘Index to Theses’ service. Unfortunately, this currently this cannot be done electronically.
15. It should be possible to automatically generate catalogue records from ERA via a Dublin Core to MARC21 cross-walk. These can be exported to the online catalogue, with links available between the two records.
WF(3): ERA
Administration
16. The final step on the thesis submission critical path is the role of the ERA administrator, who will need to check that all restricted theses have correct deposit and use licences and also a valid FOIA exemption. Once these are checked the thesis can be accessioned into repository.
17. Essentially, as soon as the thesis has been cleared by the ERA administrator the item will be available online. It is likely that this will occur before the student’s graduation. To withhold the thesis until graduation will create an administrative burden and may have implications with the FOIA. We would recommend releasing the thesis as soon as it has cleared the ERA workflow.
18. Once the thesis is online metadata from ERA will be automatically harvested via the OAI-PMH by data aggregation services, which in the future could include the BL. Similarly web-indexing robots from Google and Microsoft automatically trawl the website for their browsing services.
Figure 5: Flow chart showing summary
of e-thesis
submission processes.
